The Eugenics Agenda – Part I: Food, Water, and Medicine

Eugenics is the science of “improving” the human species through selective breeding and the manipulation of our genes, but in modern times it has become synonymous with population control.  In other words, eugenics is that act of an elite few playing god with the masses.  In order to understand the gravity of the current eugenics policies and tactics being implemented on the unknowing masses who are being used as lab rats to be tested on, it would be helpful to have a basic knowledge of the history of eugenics…

Expanding on the work of Charles Darwin and his philosophies of “natural selection” and “survival of the fittest”, Sir Francis Galton founded modern eugenics in 1883, laying the groundwork for the philosophical and scientific ideals that would come to define eugenics.  In the beginning of the 20th Century, American Charles Davenport was instrumental in bringing the “eugenics ideals” out of the scientific community and into the mainstream, creating a worldwide eugenics movement that attracted high profile supporters such as H. G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, Margaret Sanger, Marie Stopes, Winston Churchill, Theodore Roosevelt, and eventually Adolf Hitler, whose eugenics policies would result in the Holocaust.

In the first half of the 20th Century, eugenics was a popular philosophy among the “intellectual elite” of the world and was widely accepted in the academic community, especially in the United States.  Margaret Sanger advanced her birth control movement by adopting the language of the eugenics movement to discourage breeding among the mentally ill, physically disabled, the poor, and people with low IQs.  The U.S. was the testing ground for eugenics legislation, and pioneered many eugenics tactics.  In 1907, Indiana became the first of more than 30 states to adopt legislation that would forcefully sterilize individuals deemed “unfit” for reproduction, and twenty years later, the Supreme Court set a new precedent in eugenics policies in the Buck v. Bell case, which allowed Virginia to implement the compulsory sterilization of the “unfit.”  Between 1907 and 1963, 64,000 (conservatively) Americans were forcibly sterilized under eugenics legislation.

The eugenics movement lost its popularity and support when Nazi war criminals cited American eugenics policies as the inspiration for their own.  Nazi Ernst Rudin’s “Law for the Hereditarily Diseased Offspring”–the sterilization law enacted in Nazi Germany in 1933–was based on Harry H. Laughlin’s Virginia model statute of compulsory sterilization.  Laughlin was awarded an honorary doctorate from Heidelburg University in 1936, for his assistance to Hitler’s cause.  Not to mention, eugenics articles by Ernst Rudin often appeared in Margaret Sanger’s Birth Control Review.  When Nazi administrators finally went on trial in Nuremberg for their war crimes, which included the mass sterilization of more than 450,000 people in less than a decade, they justified their actions by citing the United States eugenics policies as their inspiration.

The Nazis and the Holocaust tarnished the eugenics movement that had been rapidly growing all over the world, but instead of putting an end to the movement, eugenics was just pushed underground and has since reemerged under many different names.  Eugenics is still alive and well, and is currently being practiced in the United States and all over the world.  Only now there is no legislation.  The general public doesn’t even realize it’s happening.  The modern eugenicists are sterilizing us and poisoning us right under our noses, desperately working to continue the population control agenda of the first half of the 20th Century, only now they’re not even bothering to go about it legally by getting government support through legislation.  Now, they just bribe the politicians and lobbyists, keeping them in their pockets so they’ll turn their heads as the eugenicists poison our food, water, and medicine, all in the name of population control.  Our generation is sicker, weaker, dumber, and more apathetic than any in history, and there is a very simple explanation for this.

Cancer is an industry.  Everybody is running for the cure and buying wristbands to spread awareness to help find the cure.  If we spent half as much time and money searching for why as we do searching for a cure, then we might be able to stop this disease, or at least control it.  Everybody just wants to be a part of the trendy cancer culture, sporting colorful wristbands and racing for the cure.  Everybody wants to find the right answers, but nobody wants to ask the right questions.  Why does the U.S. have the highest breast cancer rate in the world, and growing?  Why has breast cancer gone from 640,000 in 1980 to 1.6 million in 2010?  Why is cancer up 3,000% in the last few decades?  Why is death by cancer expected to double in the next twenty years?  Why are cancer rates so much higher in the developed world than they are in the undeveloped world (in Africa: 88 per 100,000 get cancer.  In North America and Western Europe: 334 and 335 per 100,000, respectively)?  These are the questions we need to be asking, and they’re the questions the pharmaceutical companies and doctors don’t want us to ask.  However, the answers to these questions are right in the open for us to see if we would only take the time to look.  Unfortunately, pharmaceutical companies have been able to count on the apathy and the ignorance of the masses to keep their multi-billion dollar industry going.

Every polio vaccine, oral and shot, from the 1950s through the 1980s had powerful live cancer viruses in them.  Merck vaccine scientist, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, one of the most prominent vaccine scientists in the history of the vaccine industry, admitted there was SV40, AIDS, leukemia, and other cancer viruses in the vaccines his company created.  The vaccines we are told protect us from the numerous strains of the flu, are loaded with foreign protein particles, mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, and other toxic agents that cause auto-immune diseases among other things, as well as various cancer viruses, type 1 diabetes, and sterilizing agents.

But vaccines are not the only reason cancer and other diseases are on the rise.  They are not the only “soft-kill” weapons being used for the eugenicists’ population control agenda.   Our food and water supply are loaded with cancer and disease causing agents.  The sodium fluoride in our water and food supply, in our toothpaste, in our mouthwash, increases dozens of major cancers, including a sevenfold increase in bone cancer.  It also causes depression and other psychological/neurological problems.  The Nazis put sodium fluoride in the water supply of their concentration camps to make their prisoners docile and weak and controllable (see why our government puts it in our water supply?).  Sodium fluoride has also been proven to lower IQs and decrease fertility.  Aspartame, which is in our gum and soft-drinks and candy, has now been found to cause low birth weights, early births, and even miscarriages, not to mention leukemia, brain cancer, seizures and other neurological problems.  Dimethylpolysiloxane, an anti-foaming food additive found in most fast foods, TV dinners, and soups, is illegal in most countries and has negative effects on the liver and reproductive system.  MSG, which is in tens of thousands of food products, is an excitotoxin that kills neurons, devastating the brain, as well as destroying the liver.

Just about everything we eat and drink is loaded with dangerous chemicals, additives, preservatives, and destructive toxins.  Even fruits and vegetables, the things that are supposed to be “healthy”, are loaded with GMO, which causes sterility over time (meaning the sterility will not manifest until the 3rd generation, which would be our children) and organ failure.  It also causes low birth weights and miscarriages, as well as causing children to go into puberty at a much younger age.  Our food is loaded with high fructose corn syrup, which we now know contains unsafe levels of mercury.  A recent Harvard study showed that people who ate canned foods for five days in a row had more than a 1,200% increase in bisphenol A (BPA), which, along with causing reproductive problems, has been linked to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity in low doses.  With all that is being put into our food, it is obvious the food industry and the FDA want it to do more harm than good.

Nobody wonders why diabetes has doubled since 1980, and why 1 in 10 (or 522 million) adults are expected to have it by 2030; or why cancer is up 3000% and why it will double in twenty years; or why antidepressant use has increased by 400% since 1988 (1 in 10 Americans; 1 in 25 adolescents); or why the sperm count of men in Western countries has decreased exponentially over the last couple of decades (1 in 5 men between 18-25 produce abnormal sperm counts, and it’s only getting dangerously worse).  It’s because we are being poisoned by our food, water, and vaccines; the very things that are meant to protect us.  If they aren’t deliberately trying to poison us and kill us off slowly, then why don’t they do anything about it?  Why do they allow these poisons to continue to be put into our food and vaccines?  The answers to these many whys are out there, but nobody will open their eyes to see them.  Or they see the answers and they remain indifferent, apathetic.  Nobody really cares that they’re being soft-killed and that’s why these companies are allowed to continue poisoning us.  That’s why so few doctors are trained the field of preventive health and nutrition.  Instead, they’re trained to believe that their purpose is to merely treat illness, not prevent them or cure them; their purpose being to get us to our average life expectancy and nothing more.  They cut you open, radiate you, or give you some pills and send you on your way.

Half of all Americans take prescription drugs, and one-third of all Americans use two or more prescription drugs.  Ten percent use five or more.  200,000 Americans die from prescription drugs every year (more than traffic accidents).  From 2000 to 2008, prescription drug deaths in teens more than doubled, and tripled in adults aged 50-69.  How many “bad drug” commercials are run on TV?  There are new ones everyday.  Commercials asking if you took such and such drug and experienced such and such symptoms, got such and such disease, got such and such cancer, or even death.  “If so, you may be entitled to compensation.  Call 1-800-BAD-DRUG to see if you qualify.”  Every single day there is another commercial for another drug.  Approximately 750,000 people a year are rushed to emergency rooms because of these “bad drugs”.  In 2009, 1,742 drugs were recalled by the FDA, which was a 309% increase from previous years.  Why does this happen?  One reason is the money.  If the U.S. healthcare system was a country, it would be the 6th largest economy in the world.  The other reason (the main reason) is, of course, population control.

Does this sound like a culture that is trying to prevent health problems and premature death, or does it sound more like a culture that is trying to commit suicide?  We are aware that the chemicals, additives, and preservatives in our food and water are poisoning us, yet we go on eating and drinking these things, even though their negative effects are well recorded; the information, the proof, is right in front of us, in plain view.  We are aware that our vaccines are loaded with dangerous toxins (including 250 times the safe level of mercury) and cancer viruses and numerous other diseases, yet we still take them because we don’t want to catch that awful flu, even though only 2.7 out of every 100 people catch the flu, and flu vaccines are only effective in 1.5 out of every 100 people.  In other words, the flu shot only decreases your chances of catching the flu by 1.2%.  These guys have a monopoly on the health and food industries.  They create the diseases and the viruses by putting them in the food and vaccines, and then we pay them to treat our diseases.  It’s a vicious cycle.  And now they want to force us to go through these body scanners at the airports while the TSA covers up the fact that there has been a dramatic surge in cases of TSA workers developing cancer as a result of their close proximity to the body scanners.

There is a population control agenda.  Eugenics is alive and well, and our doctors and pharmaceutical companies and food companies are the tip of the spear.  Our food, water, drugs, and every aspect of our lives is controlled by a small cabal of eugenicists who believe they are gods; who believe it is their duty and their right to control the population by any means necessary.  And if you were wondering where the United States Government currently stands on the issue of eugenics and population control, look no further than John P. Holdren whom President Obama selected as his advisor for Science and Technology and Director of White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (also known as Obama’s Science Czar).  In 1977, Holdren co-authored (with Paul Ehrlich) the textbook Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, in which he calls for a planetary police state to enforce sterilization laws.  The book also talks about covert sterilization tactics, such as putting sterilants in the food and water supply.

The American eugenics movement, the very movement after which Hitler and the Nazis saw fit to model their eugenics program, is thriving and the evidence is there for all see, out in the open, yet the masses refuse to look and acknowledge it as they continue to elect politicians who support this atrocious, evil ideology by taking money from these companies who are blatantly violating our human rights.

Here are some quotes by the eugenicists who have worked hard at carrying out the population control agenda.

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.” – Jacques Cousteau

“The world has a cancer, and that cancer is man.” – Merton Lambert, former spokesman for the Rockefeller foundation

“…The first task is population control at home. How do we go about it? Many of my colleagues feel that some sort of compulsory birth regulation would be necessary to achieve such control. One plan often mentioned involves the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies or staple food. Doses of the antidote would be carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired population size.” – Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”  – Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund – quoted in “Are You Ready For Our New Age Future?”, Insiders Report, American Policy Center, December ’95

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”  – Ted Turner – CNN founder and UN supporter – quoted in the McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June ’96

“Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” – Sir Julian Huxley, first director general of UNESCO (1946-1948)

“…Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.” – Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society

“To deal with this problem [increasing population and decreasing food supplies] it will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilence, and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishment of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling. What method of preventing an increase might be preferred should be left to each state to decide.” – Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society

“The nations which at present increase rapidly should be encouraged to adopt the methods by which, in the West, the increase of population has been checked. Educational propaganda, with government help, could achieve this result in a generation.” – Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society

Quotes from John P. Holdren’s Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment

“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

“If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.  The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

Sources: (Cancer) (Cancer) (cancer) (Vaccines) (Vaccines) (Vaccines) (Vaccines) (GMO) (GMO) (GMO) (Additives) (Additives) (Additives) – (Male infertility) (Diabetes) (Diabetes) (Antidepressants) (Prescription drugs) (Prescription drugs, and other),0,3886090.story?page=2 (Prescription drugs) (Prescription drugs) (Prescription drugs) (Healthcare) (TSA cancer) (BPA Harvard Study)

One Response to “The Eugenics Agenda – Part I: Food, Water, and Medicine”
  1. lphill0955 says:


Questions and comments encouraged.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: